I have this ongoing debate with a friend of mine; it’s been raging for years. We’re trying to figure out the answer to the age-old question – at what point can you say you’ve visited a country?
You think it’s straightforward, but you’re wrong.
There are many schools of thought on the subject but one thing is clear – a passport stamp is not sufficient (or in some cases even necessary). The most important thing is to partake in the culture of the country in question. Some examples would be, eating the local cuisine, visiting some giant corporate art, being gouged on the price of a postage stamp, experiencing the weather and landscape. For example on my most recent trip to Japan we ate every meal at America Town. We might as well have been in Toronto. Oh, and you have to physically leave the airport / train station / bus depot / ferry terminal / dirigible landing platform / spaceport.
By the definition I have myself created in the previous paragraph I have now visited the country of Iceland. Take that Lemon. What a magical land it is. There are airports as far as the eye can see. And car rental agencies. Many car rental agencies. Check it:

Legend has it that the first Transformer was conceived right here in Iceland.
I was very hungry after my flight.

The world’s first “e-yogurt”
Some of you will be receiving a postcard mailed from this very box.

Most of you will have settle for Visa bills and junkmail from a former Olympian explaining why he’s the best guy to sell your house.
The landscape was amazing!

Check out this vegetation.
And these clouds.

I wonder what they’re made of.
I’ve become so comfortable. This place… it’s like I’ve lived here my whole life

and never bothered to learn the local language.
We have this expression here in Iceland:
A nation knows when three know.
It’s a reference to our tiny airport-based economy and similarly-scaled infrastructure. Well, that and the fact that the population of the entire country numbers in the hundreds. What’s important to know is that us Icelanders are a very private people. We have a private island. A private language. And when it comes to preventing the spread of personal information it’s clear what needs to be done. The expression leaves no ambiguity – one of the other two people must be eliminated. This may sound a bit extreme but when you think about it, it makes perfect sense. With the third person out of the picture, the number of people that “know” will fall below the critical “three” threshold and the remaining individual will fall into line pretty damn fast.
Problem solved.
Recent Comments